“This isn’t the Britain we fought for”

A very sad article from the Daily Mail.  (h/t to Hot Air)

What would be the answer of America’s veterans to a similar question? Veterans not only of WWII, but of Korea, Vietnam, and even the current generation?

I’m afraid we already have an answer we can infer from inadequate enlistment rates.  What does it say when you have a volunteer-based military, and you have to rely on too small a cadre of the brave, the courageous, the honorable and patriotic, whom you must compel to leave home and family again and again and again to return to war.  Maybe it says that too many have concluded (with help from their teachers and professors)  “This country isn’t worth it”.

Of course I wish my dad were still alive, but I think it might have killed him to see our President doubled over obsequiously before the Japanese emperor.

Pray for our country.

President George Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation

[New York, 3 October 1789]

By the President of the United States of America. a Proclamation.

Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor–and whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me “to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.”

Now therefore I do recommend and assign Thursday the 26th day of November next to be devoted by the People of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being, who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be–That we may then all unite in rendering unto him our sincere and humble thanks–for his kind care and protection of the People of this Country previous to their becoming a Nation–for the signal and manifold mercies, and the favorable interpositions of his Providence which we experienced in thecourse and conclusion of the late war–for the great degree of tranquillity, union, and plenty, which we have since enjoyed–for the peaceable and rational manner, in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national One now lately instituted–for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed; and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and in general for all the great and various favors which he hath been pleased to confer upon us.

And also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech him to pardon our national and other transgressions–to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually–to render our national government a blessing to all the people, by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed–to protect and guide all Sovereigns and Nations (especially such as have shewn kindness onto us) and to bless them with good government, peace, and concord–To promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the encrease of science among them and us–and generally to grant unto all Mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as he alone knows to be best.

Given under my hand at the City of New-York the third day of October in the year of our Lord 1789.

[Source]

Imagine if the American President read this each November.  Imagine if each American citizen responded to it sincerely.

God’s blessings to any who read this, and may your heart be as filled with gratitude as your stomach is with food!

Yeah, tax the greedy b****ds!

Big Business?  Already done.

Big Banking?  Already done.

Who’s left?  How about…

Big Hollywood?

What a great idea.

Re: the NYC trial of KSM

As mentioned earlier, my evenings and weekends are mostly filled with preparing for my upcoming paralegal exam, but I still have breaks and lunch time at work to scan the ‘net.

Here is a column by Jonah Goldberg that clearly expresses the primary objections to referring Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to a civilian trial in NYC.

And here is a post by Andrew McCarthy at NRO on the monumental chutzpah of the Attorney General in bemoaning the Bush administration’s supposed years of delay in bringing the terrorists to justice.

As if anybody needed more evidence of why these Leftists, like their counterparts in Hollywood, are morally wretched and feckless people.

The root of Palin hatred?

This commentary in today’s Anchorage Daily News; I think a large part of the Palin-loathing can be explained by the “You’re a traitor to your kind” thinking, i.e., REAL women are liberals, just as REAL blacks are liberals.  Black conservatives can for the most part be marginalized by ignoring their existence.  Sarah cannot be ignored.

But as for the particularly unhinged ferocity of the Palin-hatred among old-line feminists, it makes one wonder whether there must not be something more going on.  I think the author of this article may have found it.

President O”bow”ma

Regarding the President’s ridiculous pathetic ridiculously pathetic bow to Emperor Akihito, this cartoon from Investor’s Business Daily explains it perfectly:


_____
11/23/09: “Reaction to Japan Bow Left Obama ‘Speechless’ “, from the CBS News blog “Political Hotsheet“.

Naturally, it’s reported that it was just those petulant conservatives who were upset.

“”Obama’s attitude was, this is an elderly gentleman in a country where this kind of greeting is customary,” said the official. “It does not seem extraordinary to show this kind of gesture to him.”

Except, yeah, it is.   ABC Senior White House correspondent Jake Tapper reported (here) that,

“An old friend — an academic with expertise about the Japanese Empire, and in general a supporter of President Obama — sends me the following note, relating to photographs of President Obama bowing to Emperor Akihito of Japan…

“Obama’s handshake/forward lurch was so jarring and inappropriate it recalls Bush’s back-rub of Merkel.

“Kyodo News is running his appropriate and reciprocated nod and shake with the Empress, certainly to show the president as dignified, and not in the form of a first year English teacher trying to impress with Karate Kid-level knowledge of Japanese customs.

“The bow as he performed did not just display weakness in Red State terms, but evoked weakness in Japanese terms…The last thing the Japanese want or need is a weak looking American president and, again, in all ways, he unintentionally played that part.”

And then there is this quickly produced video, showing forty-six (46!) handshake greetings of the emperor by other heads of state- and some of those from other Pacific region countries with similar “cultural traditions”.  Forty-six handshakes… and one bow.  Ow.

What an embarrassment.

(h/t to HA)

Veterans Day, 2009

A good commentary piece in today’s Anchorage Daily News by Lt. Col. Rob Waldman, here.  The basic question he asks the reader to consider- “Are YOU worth fighting for?”

One of the best places anywhere to help veterans in a significant way- actually, in a variety of significant ways.  Check it out, and… do something-  Soldiers’ Angels.

A salute to all fellow veterans today, to the memory of my father and his generation of veterans, and the future veterans of today- especially those members of St. John’s parish.  God be with you.

re: Ft. Hood murders- UPDATE

On the one hand we have the reliably, willfully, self-imposed PC blindness of the mainstream media’s initial reaction- “Gee, what could his motivation possibly have been?”

On the other hand, we have those who, lacking PC blinders, note that Maj. Nidal was reported to have shouted “Alla Akbar!” before opening fire, had listed his nationality as Palestinian at a local Islamic Community Center in Maryland although he was born in the U.S., had been reprimanded for proselytizing colleagues and patients about Islam, and had blog posts praising suicide bombers.  “Duh!  Jihad, obviously.”

Sounds to me like this fellow was a rather weak, marginal, unstable personality.  Almost every day in his work he heard soldiers relating the horrors of war, and when faced with deployment to the war zone- even a non-combat assignment as a medical officer- worked himself into a fearful and cowardly frame of mind.  Going out in a blaze of jihadi glory presented itself to him as a commendable way to redeem an otherwise pathetic life.

There are millions of devout Muslims worldwide who would never seriously contemplate performing such a horrific act, or any of the many other horrific acts of terror committed around the world… so we are told.  That doesn’t answer the problem of how to predict and defend against those who do.  Which of  today’s moderate Muslims becomes next month’s jihadi?

When a moderate Christian turns extreme fundamentalist, you get a Mother Theresa or a Brother Francis, a missionary or an aid-worker, or one of the growing number who forsake this world entirely and enter a monastery to pursue lives of prayer, contemplation, and service.

When a moderate Buddhist turns extreme fundamentalist you get another pacifist monk, most likely.

Extreme fundamentalist Muslims present a more problematic “public health” issue.  And as always, the biggest barrier to finding a solution is the denial or misidentification of the problem.

Lord, have mercy.  Pray for the families of the victims.

Addendum:

Mark Steyn says it better, of course, in this analysis of “The Hole at the Heart of Our Strategy”.

UPDATE:  We know more about Maj. Hasan now- much more, and very depressing in it’s implications.  Seems that our so-called intelligence agencies knew of attempts that Maj. Hasan made to contact al-Qaeda.  And did… what?

Of course, whether or not he attempted, or even succeeded in contacting al-Qaeda is beside the point, as Robert Spencer and others have convincingly argued.  If a violent and virulent ideology inspires spontaneous acts of mass violence by numerous independent operators, isn’t the effect and outcome the same?

But then again, Geraldo Rivera thinks maybe Maj. Hasan might have just had a toothache that day.

It IS discouraging.  Following 9/11, I thought that at least we would finally witness the end of politically correct self-delusions about the threat of Islam.  Now the knife was well and truly at our throat, and the mortal threat would spell the end of all such nonsense that we could indulge in during peaceful seasons.

Sadly, it has not turned out that way.  You get used to hearing politicians speak such drivel, but now its looking like the PC virus has worked its way into our defense and intelligence agencies.  And folks, if we as a society don’t find and apply a cure for it, then, I’m sorry to say- we’re screwed.

Rush is wrong re: NY-23

Been a busy day and evening, didn’t even get in any law study, and it’s way past bedtime.  There’s other topics I had in mind for commenting on recently, but frankly there are just always things of higher priority that take greater precedence in my life.  I have slightly less than four weeks left until I take the national certifying exams for the certified legal assistant/paralegal license, so that is going to have first claim on my time until then.

Just this quick comment on yesterday’s election.  I see that “El Rushbo” is adamantly against conservatives running as third party candidates, believing that that would only serve to ensure permanent Democratic Party victories.  To that end, he spent some effort on his show today explaining why NY-23 was a one-off  special case that ought not serve as an inspirational model for conservatives elsewhere.  If this, and that, and one more thing had been different, then it might be significant, but it isn’t.  I disagree.

How many elections did Norman Thomas and the Socialist Party USA win?  None.  Does that mean they were failures?  According to Rush, and Newt, and most “pragmatists” the answer is obviously “Yes”.  You can’t implement your policies if you’re not in office, right?  Or can you?

In fact, almost the entire platform of the Socialist Party has been successfully implemented and institutionalized by both Democratic and Republican administrations.  Norman Thomas was the stalking horse, field testing socialist policy proposals and proving their public appeal.  The major parties defeated the Socialists by co-opting them.  So, the question is:

If your opponent(s) can only defeat you by adopting your policies… have you really been defeated?

If your goal is to gain and exercise power yourself, then yes, you were defeated.  But if you believe that your policies offer the best hope for the country, then no- you won. As a wise person once observed, there is no limit to what one can achieve if you’re willing to let others take the credit.  For most people, that’s too high a price to pay.  That’s too bad, especially if you claim to love your country and to want what’s best for it.

Rush says a Conservative third party is a prescription for permanent Democratic Party victories.  And how well has it worked out being loyal Republicans?

 

Restoring science to its rightful place

Remember that line from President Obama’s inaugural address?  “We’ll restore science to its rightful place…”; policy decisions will no longer be tainted by crude ideology.  In truth, ideology has corrupted this administration’s policies far beyond anything seen previously.  The so-called “settled science” of global warming might top the list, but coming in a close second would be alternative “green” energy.

Two recent posts by William Tucker at the “Planet Gore” section of NRO- “Obama Lays Out His Energy Game Plan“, and,  “Our Squandered Nuclear Advantage“.  No ideology taints in THIS White House, eh?

Lord have mercy.